Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

An atypical case involving real, ghost, and pseudo-ghost images on a panoramic radiograph

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2024³â 54±Ç 1È£ p.57 ~ 62
±èÁ¾¿ø, ¼­¿ä¼·,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁ¾¿ø ( Kim Jong-Won ) - 
¼­¿ä¼· ( Seo Yo-Seob ) - Chosun University School of Dentistry Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology

Abstract


Purpose: This report presents a unique case featuring real, ghost, and pseudo-ghost images on the panoramic radiograph of a patient wearing earrings. It also explains the formation of these images in an easy-to-understand manner.

Materials and Methods: One real image and two ghost images appeared on each side of a panoramic radiograph of a patient wearing earrings on both sides. Of the two ghost images on each side, one was considered a typical ghost image and the other was considered a ghost-like real image (pseudo-ghost image). The formation zones of the real, double, and ghost images were examined based on the path and angles of the X-ray beam from the Planmeca ProMax. To simulate the pseudo-ghost and typical ghost images on panoramic radiography, a radiopaque marker was affixed to the right mandibular condyle of a dry mandible, and the position of the mandible was adjusted accordingly.

Results: The center of rotation of the Planmeca ProMax extended beyond the jaw area, and the area of double image formation also reached beyond the jaw. The radiopaque-marked mandibular condyle, situated in the outwardly extending area of double image formation, exhibited triple images consisting of real, double (pseudo-ghost), and ghost images. These findings helped to explain the image formation associated with the patient¡¯s earrings observed in the panoramic radiograph.

Conclusion: Dentists must understand the characteristics and principles of the panoramic equipment they use and apply this understanding to taking and interpreting panoramic radiographs.

Å°¿öµå

Patient Positioning; Radiography, Panoramic; Foreign bodies

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸